Dear Al:

Please run for president

1) I really need a good laugh. Politics is practiced by a bunch of clowns, but clowns always scared me when I was a kid.
2) It would be hilarious to see Hillary falling all over herself to court the radical left (your base support) while attempting to appear to be a centrist. She's been distancing herself from the lunatic fringe. You, the head lunatic, if you run, will cause her to try and grab up those other lunatics before you do.
3) You could, possibly, derail Hillary, Osama Obama, the Breck girl and yourself. Then we could have a useless Republican who, while useless, would still be better than any of your bunch.

You won the Nobel Peace Prize

for claiming that a global physical phenomenon has a cause that is not only unprovable but also unlikely? You're a joke Al. But I won't be laughing until you get into the presidential race. Don't let me down!!

You claim that the industrialized world must scale back it's activities in order to save the Earth. That's nothing but a baseless platitude Al. If you're such a "prophet in out time" (Oh my God. I'm going to puke again. I puked when I heard you won the award.) tell us how to do it and, at the same time, maintain or improve the global status quo.

Recent winners of the Peace Prize were honored for doing things that improved the condition of the world's poor and destitute. (Except for Jimmy Carter who won the award because he demonstrated the ability to stick his head farther up his butt that any former American president.) If your baseless suggestions are followed, there will be no chance for the poor and destitute. And please, give me none of that drivel about rich nations and poor nations. The poorest nations on this planet are poor because their economies are controlled (i.e. not free market) by thugs, dictators or whatever else out there that's bad in government. Get rid of the dirty rotten bastards first and then we'll have another reason to discount you're theories.

The Kyoto Treaty?

The rest of the liberal whacko world blames the US, more specifically, George Bush, for failing to sign the treaty. Under the terms of this treaty, the US and other industrialized countries (like Germany and the UK, both signed the treaty) are required to reduce Carbon Dioxide emissions while so-called developing nations like China!!! and India!!! are permitted to increase emissions.

Those who wrote the terms of the treaty claim to know how much CO2 is OK. They say they know the level above which disaster will occur. Their claims have no basis. They have no facts.

But those who wrote the terms also know that CO2 emissions are an inevitable byproduct of industrialization and wealth. And the authors, while they may not be Marxists, appear to believe in "taking from the rich to give to the poor". Yeah, I know that was Robin Hood's mantra, but it sounds a lot like Karl's mantra which I can't remember just this minute. It appears to be very important to some global bureaucrats that there be a level playing field. Sounds like they have a valid complaint about the lack of "fair play" until you realize that we built the field and not just anybody is qualified to play on it.

Oh!!! How much more arrogant can I get??? I'm wallowing in my pride of the United States of America. The little dogs that nip at our heels as we go about our business should be introduced to the ASPCA mercy killing room.

(That last sentence was written just to see if there's any support for my run at government service. :-) ;-) :-).